福州人，研究员，博士生导师。现为中国科学院研究生院人文与社会科学学位委员会副主席、中国科学院心理研究所学位委员会主席，中国科学院心理研究所行为科学重点实验室学术委员会副主任。Judgment and Decision Making期刊顾问编辑。
教育背景：
1978年～1982年，在福州大学机械工程系获工学士学位；1985年9月～1988年7月，在杭州大学（现浙江大学）心理系获教育硕士学位；1991年4月～1994年5月，在澳大利亚新南威尔士大学（University of New South Wales）心理学院获哲学博士学位。
工作经历：
1995～1996年任新南威尔士大学校长专项基金博士后研究员，1997～1998 年任澳大利亚研究理事会（ARC）澳大利亚国家博士后研究员，1999～2002年任新加坡南洋理工大学南洋商学院助理教授，2003 年任澳门科技大学行政与管理学院助理教授。
“人类在不确定条件下如何做出判断和决策”是富有前景和重要意义的科学难题。从适应性行为的观点来看，主流决策模型（包括Prospect Theory）所假定的补偿性风险决策过程是一个错误的共识，强调生态理性的研究将纠正这个似是而非的前提假设。我主要工作是发展了一个在确定、不确定及风险状态下的行为抉择模型。这一抉择模型有别与传统的计算“最大或最小期望值”模型，它假定：左右人类风险决策行为的机制不是最大限度地追求某种形式的期望（expectation）值，而是某种形式上辨察选择对象之间是否存在优势性（dominance）关系。该模型和随后发表的一系列论文对决策行为提出了“齐当别”(Equate-to-differentiate theory: A coherent bi-choice model across certainty, uncertainty and risk)的抉择见解。这些研究对经典的风险决策理论提出了有力质疑（包括两位诺贝尔经济奖获得者Allais和Kahneman的观点），引发了经济学和心理学研究者的专文评论(Carlin, 1996)和重复验证（e.g., Bonini, Tentori & Rumiati, 2004; Colbert, Murray & Nieschwietz, 2009）,并写入教科书中（e.g., Bounded Rationality and Public Policy: A Perspective from Behavioural Economics/作者：Alistair Munro; Reframing organizations: artistry, choice, and leadership/作者：Lee G. Bolman,Terrence E. Deal; Communication Yearbook 30/作者：Christina S. Beck; Messung von Zahlungsbereitschaften bei industriellen Dienstleistungen/作者：Christian M. Niederauer）。我们的行为决策研究团队借助大规模人群调查、情景模拟、实验室实验、眼动记录法、脑成像等技术系统探讨不确定环境下决策的行为和神经机制，为回答“风险决策是否遵循补偿性原则”这一问题提供行为和神经水平的理论基础和实证证据。
2008、2010年中国科学院研究生院BHP Billiton导师科研奖；心理研究所2009年度“创新团队”奖（30万）；2011年中国科学院优秀研究生指导教师奖；2012年国家自然科学基金项目（NSFC：70671099）在结题后评估中被评为“特优”；2012年中国科学院朱李月华优秀教师奖（80名）；2013年北京市优秀博士学位论文指导教师科研项目专项资助（20万）。
培养研究生获奖情况
2013年中科院院长奖、及各类奖学金
第八届华人心理学家学术研讨会“华人心理学新秀奖”（共10名）刘洪志
2013年北京市优秀博士学位论文（共59名/中科院2名）饶俪琳
2013年度中国科学院优秀博士学位论文（共84名）饶俪琳
中国科学院院长优秀奖（共240名）苏寅
2012年中科院院长奖、及各类奖学金
朱李月华优秀博士生奖（非西部地区，共121名）饶俪琳
北京市普通高等学校优秀毕业生 饶俪琳
中国科学院优秀毕业生 饶俪琳
2011年中科院院长奖、及各类奖学金
首届中国科学院研究生格致论坛二等奖（共11名）孙红月
首届中国科学院研究生格致论坛三等奖（共16名）杜雪蕾
2011年度中国科学院优秀博士学位论文（共84名）孙彦
中国科学院院长优秀奖（共240名）饶俪琳
心理所所长奖（共6名）饶俪琳
中国科学院宝洁优秀研究生奖学金 饶俪琳
2010年中科院院长奖、及各类奖学金
中国科学院研究生院BHP Billiton 奖学金（共26名） 饶俪琳
中国科学院宝洁奖（共45名）毕研玲、李金珍
中国科学院院长优秀奖（共163名）李金珍
心理所所长奖（共5名）李金珍
2010年度中国科学院优秀博士学位论文提名奖（共100名）孙彦
2009年中科院院长奖、及各类奖学金
2009年首届全国心理学博士生学术论坛优秀论文评比一等奖 （共5名）饶俪琳
中科院院长优秀奖科研启动专项资金资助（10万）孙彦
“全国心理学学术大会第二届优秀研究生论文”一等奖（共6名）孙红月
朱李月华优秀博士生奖（共300名）孙彦
2008年中科院院长奖、及各类奖学金
中国科学院院长优秀奖（共200名） 孙彦
刘永龄奖学金优秀奖（共50名） 毕研玲
宝洁优秀研究生奖学金获奖者（共50名）孙彦
地奥奖学金获奖者（共90名） 许洁虹
中国科学院研究生院BHP Billiton 奖学金（共25名） 许洁虹
2. 梁竹苑, 徐丽娟, 饶俪琳, 蒋田仔, & 李纾. (2012). “20%的概率获得蛋糕”=“获得蛋糕的20%”？检验风险决策的期望法则假设. 科学通报[J]. 57(35): 3421–3433.
3. 付阳，周媛，梁竹苑, & 李纾. (2012). 爱情的神经生理机制. 科学通报[J]. 57(35): 3376–3383.
4. 梁竹苑, 周媛, 饶俪琳, & 李纾. (2012). 从行为决策到神经经济学：一条研究演化之路. In 马庆国 (Ed.), 中国神经科学与社会科学交叉学科研究进展. 北京: 科学出版社.
5. 汪祚军, 李纾. (2012). 不确定性决策违背“确定事件原则”的心理机制再探. 应用心理学, 18(1), 24-31.
6. 李纾.(2011).胡汉民赠李晓生诗及李晓生《往事》诗一首[J].國史研究通訊.1: 160-165.
7. 杜雪蕾？，许洁虹，苏寅，李纾.(2012). 用文字概率衡量不确定性：特征和问题[J].心理科学进展. 20(5): 651–661.
8. 汪祚军, 李纾. (2012). 对整合模型和占优启发式模型的检验：基于信息加工过程的眼动研究证据[J]. 心理学报. 44(2): 179-198.
9. 汪祚军，李纾，房野. (2011). 再探究不确定状态下违背“确定事件”原则的原因[J]. 心理科学.34（6）：1463-1468.
10. 孙红月，苏寅，周坤，李纾.(2011). 从风险决策中的多次博弈到单次博弈：量变还是质变？[J].心理科学进展. 19(10): 1417-1425.
11. 李纾, 许洁虹, 叶先宝. (2011). 中文表达者的“沟通模式偏爱悖论”与“下情上达评价悖论”[J].管理评论. 23(9): 102-108.
12. 李纾.(2011). 预期理论还是占优启发式？第三只眼看风险决策.In 周仁来等(Eds.), 心理学研究新进展（第一辑）. 北京: 北京师范大学出版社. pp70-85.
13. 唐辉，孙红月，李纾. (2011). 非常规突发事件应急决策的研究述评急新思路--发展指导性模型[J]. 人类工效学. 17(1): 78-82.
14. 李纾，毕研玲，苏寅，饶俪琳. (2011). 厌而避额外之“利”；喜而趋额外之“害”[J].心理科学进展.19(1), 9–17.
15. 刘欢, 李纾. (2010). 实证研究中金钱刺激的作用以及存在的问题[J]. 人类工效学. 16(4), 40-43.
16. 孙悦, 周坤, 毕研玲, 黄贵海, 李纾. (2010). 个体参赌意愿跨情境特殊性分析[J]. 中华行为医学与脑科学杂志. 19(11): 1012-1015.
17. 梁竹苑、周媛、饶俪琳、李纾.(2010年7月29日).神经经济学：探索人类决策行为的神经基础.中国社会科学报,第12版.
18. 李纾，饶俪琳，许洁虹. (2010). 冒风险的决策者：聪明乎？糊涂乎？[J].上海管理科学. 32(3),32-37.
19. 汪祚军, 欧创巍，李纾. (2010). 整合模型还是启发式模型？从齐当别模型视角进行的检验[J]. 心理学报.42(8),821-833.
20. 李纾. (2010). 行为研究所关心的实证方法——问题与解答[J]. 心理学报. 42(1),1-3.
21. 苏寅，毕研玲, 李纾，饶俪琳. (2010). “避害”还是“趋害”？[J].心理科学, 33(2), 506-508.
22. 陳衛偉，李南，李紓. (2010).從新加坡晚晴園到南京臨時大總統府—1906～1912年間李曉生與孫中山之形影[J].文化雜誌(澳門).76,1-6.
23. 沈蕾，李纾. (2010). 也说福州方言中的“蛮”[J].现代语文(语言研究版).(3),101.
24. 徐丽娟, 梁竹苑, 王坤, 李纾, 蒋田仔.（2009）.跨期选择的神经机制:从折扣未来获益到折扣未来损失[J]. 中国基础科学, (06), 25-27.
25. 李纾,李岩梅,时勘,郑蕊.(2010). 社会认知与经济行为. In 黎岳庭 & 刘力(Eds.), 社会认知：了解自己和他人. 北京: 北京师范大学出版社.
26. 孙悦, 李纾. (2009). 澳门人的风险知觉与赌博行为. In 程惕洁 (Ed.) 澳门人文社会科学研究文选？社会卷. 北京: 社会科学文献出版社.
27. 梁哲, 许洁虹, 李纾, 孙彦, 刘长江, 叶先宝. (2009).突发公共安全事件的风险沟通难题--从心理学角度的观察. In 高全喜 (Ed.) 大国策：通向大国之路的中国策 全球视野中的公共安全. 北京: 人民日报出版社.
28. 李纾. (2009). 福州方言与马来语第一人称“我”之比较[J].现代语文(语言研究版).(12),92.
29. 李跃然，李纾. (2009). 决策者-建议者系统模型的回顾与前瞻[J].心理科学进展. 17(5), 1026-1032.（被《新华文摘》全文转载）
30. 刘欢，梁竹苑, 李纾. (2009). 得失程数的变化:损失规避现象的新视点[J]. 心理学报. 41(12),1123-1132.
31. 饶俪琳, 梁竹苑, 李纾. (2009). 迫选规则体验法：检验规范性和描述性风险决策理论的新尝试[J].心理学报.41(8),726-736.
32. 白新文, 任孝鹏, 郑蕊, 李纾. (2009). 四川灾区民众社会心理状态研究. In 张侃, 张建新 (Eds.), 5.12灾后心理援助行动纪实: 服务与探索. 北京: 科学出版社.
33. 李纾 (2009). 风险决策学科发展研究. In 中国科学技术协会 (Ed.), 2008-2009心理学学科发展报告. 北京: 中国科学技术出版社. ISBN: 978-7-5046-4933-1.
34. 白新文，任孝鹏, 郑蕊，李纾. (2009). 5.12汶川地震灾区居民的心理和谐状况及与政府满意度的关系[J]. 心理科学进展. 17(3), 574-578.
35. 李纾，刘欢，白新文，任孝鹏, 郑蕊，李金珍，饶俪琳，汪祚军. (2009). 汶川“5.12”地震中的“心理台风眼”效应[J]. 科技导报, 27(3), 87-89.
36. （美）Jonathan Baron 著 思维与决策（第4版）李纾、梁竹苑 主译[M].北京: 中国轻工业出版社，2009. ISBN: 9787501968091.
37. 刘欢，梁竹苑, 李纾. (2009). 行为经济学中的损失规避[J].心理科学进展.17(4), 788-794.
38. 李纾，毕研玲，梁竹苑，孙彦，汪祚军，郑蕊. (2009). 无限理性还是有限理性？——齐当别抉择模型在经济行为中的应用[J]. 管理评论. 21(5), 103-114.
39. 许洁虹, 李纾. (2008). 英语文字的概率表达[J]. 经济数学, 25(1), 101-111.
40. 李金珍, 李纾, 许洁虹. (2008). 灾难事件后继风险决策[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 18(4),37-43.
41. 汪祚军, 李纾. (2008).行为决策中的分离效应[J]. 心理科学进展，16(4),513-517.
42. 毕研玲, 丁见略, 李纾. (2008). 目击者信心与正确率关系及影响因素[J]. 人类工效学, 14(3)，65-68.
43. 毕研玲, 刘钊, 李纾. (2008). 群体决策与个体决策过分自信的研究[J]. 人类工效学,14(4), 49-52,77.
44. 饶俪琳, 梁竹苑, 李纾. (2008). 行为决策中的后悔[J].心理科学, 31,1185-1188.
45. 梁哲, 许洁虹, 李纾, 孙彦, 刘长江, 叶先宝. (2008).突发公共安全事件的风险沟通难题--从心理学角度的观察[J]. 自然灾害学报，17(2), 25-30.
46. 叶先宝, 李纾. (2008). 公共服务动机：内涵、检验途径与展望[J]. 公共管理学报, 5(1), 56-60.
47. 梁哲, 李纾, 许洁虹. (2007). 预期理论权重函数π的由来、质疑及Tversky的阐释[J]. 经济数学, 24(4), 331-340.
48. 许洁虹, 李纾. (2007). 汉语文字概率表达之数值转换的探索性研究[J]. 人类工效学, 13(4), 15-18.
49. 孙彦, 李纾, 王詠. (2007). 促销的心理行为研究综述[J]. 人类工效学, 13(4), 48-50.
50. 李纾, 谢晓非等. (2007). 行为决策理论之父：纪念Edwards教授2周年忌辰[J]. 应用心理学, 17(2), 99-107.(被中国人民大学书报资料中心复印资料全文转载)
51. 孙彦, 殷晓莉, 李纾. (2007). 预期理论的提出、演进及危机[J]. 应用心理学, 17(2), 168-173.
52. 梁哲, 李纾, 李岩梅, 刘长江. (2007). 幸福感预测中影响偏差的产生[J]. 中国心理卫生杂志, 21(10), 693-695.
53. 孙彦, 李纾, 殷晓莉. (2007). 决策与推理的双系统——启发式系统和分析系统[J]. 心理科学进展, 15(5), 721-845.
54. 李岩梅, 李纾, 王詠. (2007). 认知与动机因素对品牌信息处理的影响[J]. 心理科学进展, 15(4), 674-681.
55. 毕研玲, 李纾. (2007). 有限理性的“占优启发式”和“齐当别”决策模型的作为 — 当Allais悖论杠杆撬动了期望效用理论[J]. 心理科学进展, 15(4), 682-688.
56. 李岩梅, 刘长江, 李纾. (2007). 认知、动机、情感因素对谈判行为的影响[J]. 心理科学进展, 15(3), 511-517.
57. 刘长江, 李纾. (2007). 神经经济学：迈向脑科学的决策科学[J]. 心理科学, 30(2), 482-484.
58. 刘长江, 李岩梅, 李纾. (2007). 实验社会心理学中的社会困境[J]. 心理科学进展, 15(2), 379-384.
59. 李纾. (2006). 发展中的行为决策研究[J]. 心理科学进展, 14(4), 490-496.
60. 高利苹, 李纾, 时勘. (2006). 从对框架效应的分析看风险决策的神经基础[J]. 心理科学进展, 14(6), 859-865.
61. 于窈, 李纾. (2006). “过分自信”的研究及其跨文化差异[J]. 心理科学进展, 14(3), 468-474.
62. 李纾, 许洁虹, 梁哲, 施维, 李岩梅. (2005). 1988、2002和2005年度诺贝尔经济学奖得主以及心理学界对Savage确定事件原则（sure-thing principle）的研究[J]. 管理评论, 17(11), 10-18.
63. 李纾. (2005). 确定、不确定及风险状态下选择反转:“齐当别”选择方式的解释(英文)[J]. 心理学报, 37(4), 427-433.
64. 孙悦, 李纾. (2005). 澳门人的风险知觉与赌博行为[J]. 心理学报, 37(2), 260-267.
65. 李纾. (2003). 论闽方言及其演变[J]. 浙江大学学报（人文社会科学版），33(3), 65-73.
66. 李纾. (2001). 艾勒悖论（Allais Paradox）另释[J]. 心理学报, 33(2), 176-181.
67. 李纾. (2001). 辛亥年间同盟会员在伦敦活动补录[J]. 史学月刊, 6, 123-127.
68. 李纾, 房永青, 张迅捷. (2000). 再探框架对风险决策行为的影响[J]. 心理学报, 32(2), 229-234.
69. Du, X-L., Liu, S-H., Xu, J-H.,Rao, L-L., Jiang, C-M.,&Li, S. (2013). When uncertainty meets life: the effect of animacy on probability expression. Judgment and Decision Making.8(4), 425-438.
70. Rao, L-L., Liu, X-N., Li, Q., Zhou, Y., Liang, Z-Y., Sun, H-Y., Zhou, R-L., &Li, S. (2013).Toward a mental arithmetic process in risky choices.Brain and Cognition. 83(3), 307–314. (2011 Ranking: 12 of 84 in Psychology - Experimental; 5-year Impact Factor: 3.495; Acceptance: 32%)DOI:10.1016/j.bandc.2013.09.009
71. Sun, H-Y.,Rao, L-L.,Zhou, K.,&Li, S. (Online17 Jul 2013). Formulating an emergency plan based on expectation-maximization is one thing, but applying it to a single case is another. Journal of Risk Research.(2012 Impact Factor: 1.240; Ranking: 17/92 (Social Sciences, Interdisciplinary); Acceptance: %)DOI:10.1080/13669877.2013.816333
72. Jiang, C-M, Zheng, R, Zhou, Y, Liang, Z-Y, Rao, L-L, Sun, Y, Tan, C, Chen, X-P, Tian, Z-Q, Bai, Y-Q, Chen, S-G, Li, S. (2013). Effect of 45-day simulated microgravity on the evaluation of orally reported emergencies. Ergonomics. 56(8), 1225-1231. DOI: 10.1080/00140139.2013.809481 (SJR 2011 Ranking: 3 of 15 in Ergonomics; 2012 Impact Factor: 1.674; 5-year Impact Factor: 1.831)
73. Su, Y., Rao, L-L., Sun, H-Y., Du, X-L., Li, X., &Li, S. (on line). Is making a risky choice based on a weighting and adding process? An eye-tracking investigation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. （SCI/SSCI 索引）(2011 Ranking:: 18 of 84 in Psychology - Experimental; 2012 Impact Factor: 2.918; 5-year Impact Factor: 3.745; Acceptance: 23%)
74. Bi, Y-L., Du, X-L., &Li, S. (2013).Peer comparison overconfidence: Does it measure bias in self-evaluation? PsyCh Journal. 2(1), 17-25.
75. Su, Y., Zheng, Y., & Li, S. (2012). Culture, distance, and threat perception:Comment on Stamps (2011). Perceptual & Motor Skills. 115(3), 752-754.
76. Su, Y., Rao, L-L., Li, X., Wang, Y., & Li, S. (2012). From quality to quantity: The role of common feature in consumer preference. Journal of Economic Psychology.33(6), 1043–1058. (2012Impact Factor: 1.081,5-year Impact Factor1.749; Acceptance: 22%)
77. Li, S., Li, Y-R., Su, Y.,& Rao, L-L. (2012). Is an idea different from cake: can you have it and eat it, too? A violation of permanence in information consumption?.PLoS ONE.7(7): e41490. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0041490.
78. Rao, L-L.,Li, S., Jiang, T-Z.,& Zhou, Y. (2012). Is payoff necessarily weighted by probability when making a risky choice? Evidence from functional connectivity analysis. PLoS ONE.7(7): e41048. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0041048.
79. Sun, Y., Li, S.,Bonini, N.&Su, Y. (2012). Graph framing effects in decision making.Journal of Behavioral Decision Making. 25(5), 491–501. (CA; 2011 Ranking: 9/72 in Psychology, Applied; 2011 Impact Factor: 2.842)
80. Li, S., Jiang, C-M, Dunn, J. C.,& Wang, Z.-J. (2012). A test of “reason-based” and “reluctance-to-think” accounts of the disjunction effect. Information Sciences.184(1), 166-175. (2010 Ranking:10/128 in Computer Science, Information Systems; 2012 Impact Factor: 3.643; 5-year Impact Factor: 3.676)
81. Wang, Z.-J., Li, S., & Jiang, C-M., (2012). Emotional response in a disjunction condition. Journal of Economic Psychology. 33(1), 71-78.(CA; 2010 Ranking: 72/305 in Economics, 46/120 in Psychology, Multidisciplinary; 2010 Impact Factor: 1.358; 5-year Impact Factor: 1.749)
82. Zhou, K., Tang, H., Sun, Y., Huang, G-H., Rao, L-L., Liang, Z-Y.,&Li, S.(2012). Believe in luck or in skill: which locks people into gambling?Journal of Gambling Studies.28(3), 379-391. (CA; 2010 Ranking: 50/120 in Psychology, Multidisciplinary; 2010 Impact Factor: 1.303; 5-year Impact Factor: 1.881) 1.469
83. Li, S., Wang, Z-J., Rao,L-L.,Zheng,R., Ren,X-P.,Li, J-Z.,Liu, H., Bi, Y-L., Wang, F.,&Bai, X-W.(2011). How long is long enough: Public worry about the devastated students' academic career since Wenchuan Earthquake.Psychologia. 54, 80-86.(2010 Ranking: 74/81 in Psychology, Experimental; 2010 Impact Factor: 0.581; 5-year Impact Factor: 0.675)
84. Li, J-Z., Li, S., & Liu, H. (2011).How has the Wenchuan Earthquake influenced people’s intertemporal choices? Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 41(11), 2739–2752. (CA; 2010 Ranking: 49/58 in Psychology, Social; 2010 Impact Factor: 0.721; 5-year Impact Factor: 1.21)
85. Sun, Y., Wang, F., & Li, S.(2011).Higher height, higher ability: Judgment confidence as a function of spatial height perception. PLoS ONE.6(7): e22125.doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0022125(co-CA; 2010 Ranking: 12/86 in Biology; 2010 Impact Factor: 4.411; 5-year Impact Factor: 4.610)
86. Sun, Y., &Li, S. (2011). Testing the effect of risk on intertemporal choice in the Chinese cultural context. Journal of Social Psychology. 151(4), 517–522.(CA; 2010 Ranking: 50/58 in Psychology, Social; 2010 Impact Factor: 0.691; 5-year Impact Factor: 1.1)
87. Rao, L-L., Zhou, Y., Xu, L-J., Liang, Z-Y., Jiang, T-Z., &Li, S. (2011). Are riskychoices actually guided by a compensatory process? New insights from fMRI. PLoS ONE. 6(3): e14756.doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0014756(CA; 2010 Ranking: 12/86 in Biology; 2010 Impact Factor: 4.411; 5-year Impact Factor: 4.610)
88. Li, Q., Qin, S., Rao, L-L., Zhang, W., Ying, X., Guo, X., Guo, C., Ding, J., Li, S., &Luo, J.(2011).Can Sophie's choice be adequately captured by cold computation of minimizing losses? An fMRI study of vital loss decisions. PLoS ONE. 6(3): e17544. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0017544(CA; 2010 Ranking: 12/86 in Biology; 2010 Impact Factor: 4.411; 5-year Impact Factor: 4.610)
89. Rao, L-L. &Li, S. (2011). New paradoxes in intertemporal choice. Judgment and Decision Making. 6(2), 122-129.(2011 Ranking: 17/124 in PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY; 2011 Impact Factor: 2.620; 5-year Impact Factor: 2.623)
90. Li, S., Bi, Y-L., Su, Y., & Rao, L-L. (2011).An additional gain can make you feel bad and an additional loss can make you feel good. Advances in Psychological Science. 19(1), 9-17.
91. Li, S., Bi, Y-L., & Rao, L-L. (2011). Every Science/Nature potter praises his ownpot ― Can we believe what he says based on hismother tongue?Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology. 42(1), 125-130.(CA; 2010 Ranking: 15/58 in Psychology, Social; 2010 Impact Factor: 1.857; 5-year Impact Factor: 2.498)Impact Factor: 1.418Ranked: 24 out of 59 in Psychology, Social
92. Rao, L-L., Han, R., Ren, X.-P., Bai, X.-W., Zheng, R., Liu, H.,Wang, Z.-J., Li, J.-Z., Zhang, K.,&Li, S. (2011). Disadvantage and prosocial behavior: The effects of the Wenchuan earthquake. Evolution and Human Behavior.32(1),63-69. (CA; 2010 Ranking: 2/14 in Psychology, Biological, 2/34 in Social Sciences, Biomedical; 2012 Impact Factor: 3.946; 5-year Impact Factor: 4.249)(ranked 4th out of 37 journals in the ISI SOCIAL SCIENCES, BIOMEDICAL category and also 4th out of 14 journals in the ISI PSYCHOLOGY category*.2011 Impact Factor3.113)
93. Li, Y.M., Murata,K., &Li, S. (2010). Better safe than sorry: situational correction in interpersonal competition. Social Cognition. 28(4), 465-489.(2010 Ranking: 17/58 in Psychology, Social; 2010 Impact Factor: 1.76; 5-year Impact Factor: 2.408)
94. Sun, Y., Li, S.,&Bonini, N.(2010). Attribute salience in graphical representations affects evaluation. Judgment and Decision Making. 5(3), 151-158.(CA; 2010 Ranking: 35/120 in Psychology, Multidisciplinary;2010 Impact Factor: 1.632; 5-year Impact Factor: 1.79)
95. Li, S., Rao, L-L., Bai, X-W., Zheng, R., Ren, X-P., Li, J-Z., Wang, Z-J., Liu, H.,& Zhang, K. (2010). Progression of the “Psychological Typhoon Eye” and variations since the Wenchuan earthquake. PLoS ONE. 5(3): e9727. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0009727(co-CA; 2010 Ranking: 12/86 in Biology; 2010 Impact Factor: 4.411; 5-year Impact Factor: 4.610)
96. Li, S., Wang, Z-J., Rao, L-L., & Li, Y.M. (2010). Is there a violation ofSavage’s sure-thing principle in the prisoner’s dilemma game? Adaptive Behavior. 18, 377-385. (2010 Ranking: 18/84 in Social Sciences, Interdisciplinary; 2012 Impact Factor: 1.113; 5-year Impact Factor: 1.545
97. Sun, Y., & Li, S. (2010). The effect of risk on intertemporal choice.Journal of Risk Research.13(6), 805–820.(CA; 2010 Ranking: 26/84 in Social Sciences, Interdisciplinary; 2010 Impact Factor: 0.946)2011 Impact Factor: 0.880 Ranking: 33/89 (Social Sciences, Interdisciplinary)
98. Li, S., Su, Y.,&Sun, Y. (2010). The effect of pseudo-immediacy on intertemporal choices. Journal of Risk Research. 13(6), 781–787.(2010 Ranking: 26/84 in Social Sciences, Interdisciplinary; 2010 Impact Factor: 0.946)
99. Li, J-Z., Li, S., Wang, W-Z.,Rao, L-L., & Liu, H. (2011). Are people alwaysmore risk averse after disasters? Surveys after a heavy snow-hit and a major earthquake in China in 2008. Applied Cognitive Psychology. 25(1), 104–111.(CA; 2010 Ranking: 48/81 in Psychology, Experimental; 2010 Impact Factor: 1.626; 5-year Impact Factor: 2.072)
100. Li, S., Li, J-Z.,Chen, Y-W., Bai, X-W., Ren, X-P., Zheng, R., Rao, L-L., Wang, Z-J., & Liu, H. (2010). Can overconfidence be debiased by low-probability/high-consequence event? Risk Analysis. 30(4), 699-707. (CA; 2012 Ranking: 4/44 in Social Sciences Mathematical Methods; 2012 Impact Factor: 2.278; 5-year Impact Factor:2.468)
101. Li, S., Zhou, K., Sun, Y., Rao, L-L., Zheng, R., &Liang, Z-Y(2010). Anticipatedregret, risk perception, or both: Which is most likely responsible for our intention to gamble? Journal of Gambling Studies. 26(1),105-116.(2010 Ranking: 50/120 in Psychology, Multidisciplinary; 2010 Impact Factor: 1.303; 5-year Impact Factor: 1.881)
102. Li, S., Rao, L-L., Bai, X-W., Ren, X-P., Zheng, R., Li, J-Z., Wang, Z-J., & Liu, H. (2009). Psychological typhoon eye in the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake. PLoS ONE 4(3): e4964. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0004964(2010 Ranking: 12/86 in Biology; 2010 Impact Factor: 4.411; 5-year Impact Factor: 4.610)
103. Liu, C-J.,&Li. S. (2009). Contextualized self: When the self runs into social dilemmas. International Journal of Psychology. 44(6), 451-458. (2010 Ranking: 60/120 in Psychology, Multidisciplinary; 2010 Impact Factor: 1.067; 5-year Impact Factor: 1.117)
104. Xu, LJ., Liang, ZY, Wang, K., Li, S., & Jiang, TZ. (2009). Neural mechanism of intertemporal choice: From discounting future gains to future losses. Brain Research. 1261, 65-74. (CA; 2010 Ranking:128/239 in Neurosciences; 2010 Impact Factor: 2.623; 5-year Impact Factor: 2.665;Acceptance: 42%)
105. Li, L-B., He, S-H., Li, S., Xu, J-H., &Rao, L-L. (2009). A closer look at the Russian roulette problem: A re-examination of the non-linearity of the prospect theory’s decision weight π.International Journal of Approximate Reasoning. 50(3), 515-520. (CA; 2010 Ranking: 38/108 in Computer Science, Artificial Intelligence; 2010 Impact Factor: 1.684; 5-year Impact Factor: 1.720; 2011 Impact Factor: 1.948; 5-year Impact Factor: 2.155)
106. Li, S., Bi, Y-L. &Zhang, Y. (2009). Asian risk-seeking and overconfidence. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 39(11), 2706-2736.(CA; 2010 Ranking: 49/58 in Psychology, Social; 2010 Impact Factor: 0.721; 5-year Impact Factor: 1.21)
107. Han, R., Li, S. & Shi, J.N. (2009). The territorial prior residence effect and children’s behavior in social dilemmas. Environment and Behavior, SAGE Publications-USA. 41(5), 644-657.(CA; 2010 Ranking: 18/78 in Environmental Studies, 25/120, Psychology, Multidisciplinary; 2010 Impact Factor: 1.921; 5-year Impact Factor: 2.297)
108. Xu, J-H., Ye, X-B., &Li, S. (2009). Communication mode preference paradox among native Chinese speakers. Journal of Social Psychology, Heldref Publications -USA. 149(1), 125 – 129.(2010 Ranking: 50/58 in Psychology, Social; 2010 Impact Factor: 0.691; 5-year Impact Factor: 1.1)
109. Li, S. &Liu, C-J. (2008). Individual differences in a switch from risk-averse preferences for gains to risk-seeking preferences for losses: Can personality variables predict the risk preferences? Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis-UK. 11(5), 673-686.(CA; 2010 Ranking: 26/84 in Social Sciences, Interdisciplinary; 2010 Impact Factor: 0.946)
110. Sun, Y., Li, S., & Li, Y-M. (2008). Reexamine the role of the description of problem texts in the disjunction effect. Journal of Psychology, Heldref Publications -USA. 142(3), 261 – 265.(CA; 2010 Ranking: 73/120 in Psychology, Multidisciplinary; 2010 Impact Factor: 0.899; 5-year Impact Factor: 1.159)
111. Li, S., Zheng, R., & Li, L-B. (2007). Do shared features of offered alternatives have an effect in consumer choice? Journal of Economic Psychology. 28(6), 658-677.(CA;2010 Ranking: 72/305 in Economics, 46/120 in Psychology, Multidisciplinary; 2010 Impact Factor: 1.358; 5-year Impact Factor: 1.749)
112. Li, S., Sun, Y., & Wang, Y. (2007). 50% off or buy one get one free? Frame preference as a function of consumable nature in dairy products. Journal of Social Psychology, Heldref Publications –USA. 147 (4), 413 - 421.(CA; 2010 Ranking: 50/58 in Psychology, Social; 2010 Impact Factor: 0.691; 5-year Impact Factor: 1.1)
113. Li, S., Taplin, J.E., & Zhang, Y. (2007). The equate-to-differentiate’s way of seeing the prisoner’s dilemma. Information Sciences. 177(6), 1395-1412. (CA; 2010 Ranking:10/128 in Computer Science, Information Systems; 2010 Impact Factor: 2.833; 5-year Impact Factor: 3.005)
114. Li, S. & Li, Y.M.(2007). How far is far enough: A measure of information privacy in terms of interpersonal distance. Environment and Behavior, SAGE Publications-USA. 39(3), 317-331.(2010 Ranking: 18/78 in Environmental Studies, 25/120, Psychology, Multidisciplinary; 2010 Impact Factor: 1.921; 5-year Impact Factor: 2.297)Impact Factor: 1.275Ranked: 50 out of 124 in Psychology, Multidisciplinary
115. Li, S. & Liang, Z-Y. (2007). Action/inaction and regret: The moderating effect of closeness. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, Bellwether Publishing-USA. 37(4), 807-821.(CA; 2010 Ranking: 49/58 in Psychology, Social; 2010 Impact Factor: 0.721; 5-year Impact Factor: 1.21)
116. Li, S. & Xie, X. (2006). A newlook at the “Asian disease” problem: A choice between the best possible outcomes or between the worst possible outcomes? Thinking and Reasoning, Psychology Press-UK. 12(2), 129-143.(2010 Ranking: 72/81 in Psychology, Experimental; 2010 Impact Factor: 0.778; 5-year Impact Factor: 1.213)
117. Li, S. (2006). Preference reversal: A new look at an old problem. Psychological Record, Psychological record-USA. 56 (3), 411-428.(CA; 2010 Ranking: 57/120 in Psychology, Multidisciplinary; 2010 Impact Factor: 1.114; 5-year Impact Factor: 1.006)
118. Li, S., Chen, W-W., & Yu, Y. (2006). The reason for Asian overconfidence. Journal of Psychology, Heldref Publications -USA.140 (6),615-618.(CA; 2010 Ranking: 73/120 in Psychology, Multidisciplinary; 2010 Impact Factor: 0.899; 5-year Impact Factor: 1.159)
119. Li, S., Triandis, H.C., & Yu, Y. (2006). Cultural orientation and corruption. Ethics &Behavior, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates –USA. 16(3), 199-215.(CA; 2010 Ranking: 26/39 in Ethics, 91/120 in Psychology, Multidisciplinary; 2010 Impact Factor: 0.528; 5-year Impact Factor: 0.797)
120. Li, S. (2005). Romantic music activates minds rooted in a particular culture. Journal of Consciousness Studies, Imprint academic -UK. 12(7), 31–37.(SJR 2009 Ranking: Q1(Top 25%) in Philosophy)
121. Chen, X P. & Li, S. (2005). Cross-National differences in cooperative decision making in mixed-motive business contexts: The mediating effect of vertical and horizontal individualism. Journal of International Business Studies,Palgrave Publishers-UK. 36(6), 622-636.(2010 Ranking: 3/103 in Business, 9/144 in Management; 2010 Impact Factor: 4.184; 5-year Impact Factor: 5.539)
122. Li, S. & Lee-Wong, S. M. (2005). A study on Singaporeans’ perception of sexual harassment from a cross-cultural perspective. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, Bellwether Publishing-USA. 35(4), 699-717.(CA; 2010 Ranking: 49/58 in Psychology, Social; 2010 Impact Factor: 0.721; 5-year Impact Factor: 1.21)
123. Li, S. (2004-a). A behavioral choice model when computational ability matters. Applied Intelligence, Kluwer-USA. 20(2), 147-163.
124. Li, S. (2004-b). Decision-making of the collectivist family in risk-seeking and overconfidence. In Kashima, Y., Endo, Y., Kashima, E., Leung, C., and McClure, J. (Eds.), Progress in Asian Social Psychology, 4, 263-288. Seoul, Korea: Kyoyook-kwahak-sa.
125. Li, S. (2004-c). An alternative way of seeing the Allais-type violations of the sure-thing principle. Humanomics, Barmarick Publications-UK. 20(1&2), 17-31.
126. Li, S. (2004-d). Equate-to-differentiate approach: An application in binary choice under uncertainty, Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer-Germany. 12(3), 269-294.
127. Li, S., & Fang, Y. (2004). Respondents in Asian cultures (e.g., Chinese) are more risk-seeking and more overconfident than respondents in other cultures (e.g., in United States) but the reciprocal predictions are in total opposition: How and why? Journal of Cognition and Culture, Brill Academic Publishers - The Netherlands. 4(2), 263-292.(SJR 2009 Ranking: Q1(Top 25%) in Cultural Studies)
128. Li, S. (2003-a). Violations of conjoint independence in binary choices: The equate-to-differentiate interpretation, European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier-The Netherlands. 148, 65-79.(2009 Ranking: 10/73 = 13.70% in Operations Research & Management Science; 2009 Impact Factor: 2.093; 2010 Impact Factor: 2.158; Acceptance: 22%)
129. Li, S. (2003-b). The role of expected value illustrated in decision-making under risk: single-play vs multiple-play. Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis-UK. 6(2), 113-124.(CA; 2010 Ranking: 26/84 in Social Sciences, Interdisciplinary; 2010 Impact Factor: 0.946)
130. Li, S. (2002). Do money-earning time and money-exchanging route matter? Psychology and Marketing, Wiley-USA. 19(9), 777-782.(CA; 2010 Ranking: 50/103 in Business, 29/69 in Psychology, Applied; 2010 Impact Factor: 1.385; 5-year Impact Factor: 1.934)
131. Li, S. &Taplin, J.E. (2002). Examining whether there is a disjunction effect in Prisoner’s Dilemma Games. Chinese Journal of Psychology, Taiwan. 44(1), 25-46.
132. Li, S., & Fang, Y. (2002). Are Kiasuism and Singapore 21 diametrically opposed in influencing Singaporeans’ decision-making? Psychologia, PsychologiaSociety-Japan. 45(1), 34-45.(2010 Ranking: 74/81 in Psychology, Experimental; 2010 Impact Factor: 0.581; 5-year Impact Factor: 0.675)
133. Li, S. (2002). An evaluation of traditional English-Chinese translation criteria for Internet-related technological terms: A study using multivariate analyses. Journal of Translation Studies, Hong Kong. 7, 45-58.
134. Li, S. (2001). How closeis tooclose? A comparison of proxemic reactions of Singaporean Chinese to male intruders of four ethnicities. Perceptual and Motor Skills. Ammons Scientific-USA. 93, 124-126.(CA; 2010 Ranking: 77/81 in Psychology, Experimental; 2010 Impact Factor: 0.492; 5-year Impact Factor: 0.566)
135. Li, S. (2001). Extended research on dominance violations in similarity judgments: The equate-to-differentiate interpretation. Korean Journal of Thinking and Problem Solving, Korean Association for Thinking-South Korea. 11(1), 13-38.
136. Li, S. (2001). Equate-to-differentiate: The role ofshared and unique features in the judgment process. Australian Journal of Psychology, APS-Australia. 53(2), 109-118.(CA; 2010 Ranking: 83/120 in Psychology, Multidisciplinary; 2010 Impact Factor: 0.644; 5-year Impact Factor: 0.922)
137. Li, S. & Taplin, J.E. (2001). A test of independence axiom in diagnosis context that offers common symptom.Psychologia, PsychologiaSociety-Japan. 44(3), 188-196.(2010 Ranking: 74/81 in Psychology, Experimental; 2010 Impact Factor: 0.581; 5-year Impact Factor: 0.675)
138. Li, S. (1999). One country two systems: A psychological perspective. Psychology and Developing Societies, Sage-India. 11(2), 157-177.
139. Li, S. (1998-a). Can the conditions governing the framing effect be determined? Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier-The Netherlands. 19, 133-153. (CA; 2010 Ranking: 72/305 in Economics, 46/120 in Psychology, Multidisciplinary; 2010 Impact Factor: 1.358; 5-year Impact Factor: 1.749)
140. Li, S. (1998-b). Tian Ji and Chariot-racing: Violation of dominance in similarity judgment of Chinese characters. Psychologia, PsychologiaSociety-Japan. 41, 20-31.(CA; 2010 Ranking: 74/81 in Psychology, Experimental; 2010 Impact Factor: 0.581; 5-year Impact Factor: 0.675)
141. Li, S. (1996-a). An additional violation of transitivity and independence between alternatives. Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier-The Netherlands. 17, 645-650. (CA; 2010 Ranking: 72/305 in Economics, 46/120 in Psychology, Multidisciplinary; 2010 Impact Factor: 1.358; 5-year Impact Factor: 1.749)
142. Li, S. (1996-b). What is the price for utilizing deductive reasoning? A reply to generalized expectation maximizers. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, Elsevier-The Netherlands. 29(2), 355-358.
143. Li, S. (1995). Is there a decision weight p? Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, Elsevier-The Netherlands. 27(3), 453-463.
144. Li, S., & Adams, A. S. (1995). Is there something more important behind framing? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 62, 216-219. (CA; 2010 Ranking: 36/144 in Management, 11/69 in Psychology, Applied, 6/58 in Psychology, Social; 2010 Impact Factor: 2.48; 5-year Impact Factor: 3.586)
145. Li, S., Zhu, Z., & Adams, A. S. (1995). An exploratory study of arm-reach reaction time and eye-hand coordination. Ergonomics, Taylor & Francis-UK. 38 (4) 637-650. (2010 Ranking: 4/14 in Ergonomics, 30/69 in Psychology, Applied; 2010 Impact Factor: 1.377; 5-year Impact Factor: 1.779)
146. Li, S. (1994-a). What is the role of transparency in cancellation? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Academic-USA. 60, 353-366. (2010 Ranking: 36/144 in Management, 11/69 in Psychology, Applied, 6/58 in Psychology, Social; 2010 Impact Factor: 2.48; 5-year Impact Factor: 3.586)
147. Li, S. (1994-b). Is there a problem with preference reversals? Psychological Reports, Ammons Scientific-USA. 74, 675-679. (2010 Ranking: 96/120 in Psychology, Multidisciplinary; 2010 Impact Factor: 0.439; 5-year Impact Factor: 0.446)
148. Li, S. (1993). What is wrong withAllais' certainty effect? Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, Wiley-UK. 6, 271-281.(2010 Ranking: 24/69 in Psychology, Applied; 2010 Impact Factor: 1.672; 5-year Impact Factor: 2.409)
149. Li, S., & Xi, Z. (1990). The measurement of functional arm reach envelopes for young Chinese males. Ergonomics, Taylor & Francis-UK. 33(7), 967-978. (2010 Ranking: 4/14 in Ergonomics, 30/69 in Psychology, Applied; 2010 Impact Factor: 1.377; 5-year Impact Factor: 1.779)
Li, S. (1994). “Equate-to-differentiate theory: A coherent bi-choice model across certainty, uncertainty and risk,” (Doctoral dissertation, University of New South Wales, 1994). Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: the Sciences & Engineering. Vol 55(4-B), 1658.
2011年度国家社会科学基金重大项目《突发公共事件舆情应对与效果评估信息平台建设研究》（80万）
子课题负责人 郑昱
2010年中国科学院研究生科技创新资助专项（2.5万元）
《情感强度与风险决策：大喜大悲的人倾向于规避损失》 唐辉
2009年中国科学院研究生科技创新资助专项 （2万元）：
《共享特征效应的深入研究——从“质”到“量”，从行为实验到眼动研究》 苏寅
2007年度中国科学院研究生科学与社会实践资助专项创新研究类项目（2万元）
《风险决策中获益与损失不对称的脑机制研究》 饶俪琳