1. Huang, Z., Feng, C., & Qu, Q. Q.* (2023). Predicting coarse-grained semantic features in language comprehension: evidence from ERP representational similarity analysis and Chinese classifier. Cerebral Cortex, bhad116 (5-Year IF = 5.998).

2. Wei, W., Huang, Z., Feng, C., & Qu, Q. Q.* (2023). Predicting Phonological Information in Language Comprehension: Evidence from ERP Representational Similarity Analysis and Chinese Idioms. Cerebral Cortex, bhad209 (5-Year IF = 5.998).

3. Li, X. & Qu, Q. Q.* (2023). Verbal working memory capacity modulates semantic and phonological prediction in spoken comprehension. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. doi:10.3758/s13423-023-02348-5

4. Li, X., Li, X. & Qu, Q. Q.*(2022). Predicting phonology in language comprehension: Evidence from the visual world eye tracking task in Chinese. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 48(5), 531–547. (SSCI-JCR-2021: Q2, 5-Year IF = 3.304)

5. Feng, C., Damian, M. F. & Qu, Q. Q.* (2022). A joint investigation of facilitation and interference effects of semantic and phonological similarity in a continuous naming task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0001139 (SSCI-JCR-2021: Q1, 5-Year IF = 3.532)

6. Qu, Q. Q.*, Feng, C.*, & Damian, M. F. (2021). Interference Effects of Phonological Similarity in Word Production Arise from Competitive Incremental Learning. Cognition, 212, 104738. (SSCI-JCR-2021: Q1, 5-Year IF = 4.698)

7. Feng, C., Damian, M. F. & Qu, Q. Q.* (2021). Parallel Processing of Semantics and Phonology in Spoken Production: Evidence from Blocked Cyclic Picture Naming and EEG. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 33(4), 725–738. (SSCI-JCR-2021: Q2, 5-Year IF = 3.689)

8. Qu, Q. Q.* & Damian, M. F. (2020). An electrophysiological analysis of the time course of phonological and orthographic encoding in written word production. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 35, 360-373. (SSCI-JCR-2021: Q1, 5-Year IF = 3.212)

9. Qu, Q. Q.*, Chen, F., Hou, F., & Damian, M. F. (2020). Syllables and phonemes as planning units in Mandarin Chinese spoken word production: Evidence from ERPs. Neuropsychologia, 146, 107559. (SSCI-JCR-2021: Q2, 5-Year IF = 3.563)

10.Feng, C. & Qu, Q. Q.* (2020). Phonological inhibition in written production. Psychological Research.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-020-01414-0 (SSCI-JCR-2021: Q2, 5-Year IF = 2.539)

11. Qu, Q. Q.* & Damian, M. F. (2019). Orthographic effects in Mandarin spoken language production. Memory & Cognition, 47(2), 326-334. (SSCI-JCR-2021: Q3, 5-Year IF = 2.825)

12. Qu, Q. Q.* & Damian, M. F. (2019). The role of orthography in second-language spoken word production: Evidence from Tibetan–Chinese bilinguals. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72(11), 2597-2604. (SSCI-JCR-2021: Q3, 5-Year IF = 2.582)

13. Xu, P., Qu, Q. Q.*, Shen, W., & Li, X. (2019). Co-activation of taxonomic and thematic relations in spoken word comprehension: Evidence from eye movements. Frontiers in Psychology, 10:964. (SSCI-JCR-2021: Q1, 5-Year IF = 4.426)

14. Perret, C. & Qu, Q. Q. (2019). EEG Methods of Exploring Written Word Production. In Cyril Perret and Thierry Olive (Eds). Spelling and Writing Words. France: BRILL.

15. Qu, Q. Q.*, Cui, Z. L., & Damian, M. F. (2018). Orthographic effects in second-language spoken word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 44(8), 1325-1332. (SSCI-JCR-2021: Q1, 5-Year IF = 3.532)

16. Shen, W., Qu, Q. Q, & Tong, X. H.* (2018). Visual attention shifts to printed words during spoken word recognition in Chinese: The role of phonological information. Memory & Cognition, 46(4), 642-654. (SSCI-JCR-2021: Q3, 5-Year IF = 2.825)

17. Qu, Q. Q.*, & Damian, M. F. (2017). Orthographic effects in spoken word recognition: Evidence from Chinese,Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 24(3), 901-906. (SSCI-JCR-2021: Q1, 5-Year IF = 5.606)

18. Damian, M. F., & Qu, Q. Q.* (2017). Exploring the role of logographemes in Chinese handwritten word production. Reading and Writing, 1-27. (SSCI-JCR-2021: Q1, 5-Year IF = 3.208)

19. Shen, W., Qu, Q. Q, Ni, A., Zhou, J., & Li, X.* (2017). The time course of morphological processing during spoken word recognition in Chinese. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 24(6), 1957-1963. (SSCI-JCR-2021: Q1, 5-Year IF = 5.606)

20. Damian, M. F. E., & Qu, Q. Q. (2017). Syllables as representational units in English handwritten production? In Sylvie Plane et al. (Eds). Research on Writing: Multiple Perspectives. France. WAC Clearinghouse.

21. Qu, Q. Q.*, Zhang, Q. F. & Damian, M. F. (2016). Tracking the Time Course of Lexical Access in Orthographic Production: An Event-Related Potential Study of Word Frequency Effects in Written Picture Naming, Brain and Language, 159, 118-126. (SSCI-JCR-2021: Q1, 5-Year IF = 3.512)

22. Qu, Q. Q.*, Damian, M. F., & Li, X. (2016). Phonology contributes to writing: Evidence from a masked priming task.Language, Cognition, and Neuroscience, 31(2), 251-264. (SSCI-JCR-2021: Q1, 5-Year IF = 3.212)

23. Shen, W., Qu, Q. Q.*, & Li, X.* (2016). Semantic information mediates visual attention during spoken word recognition in Chinese: Evidence from the printed-word version of visual-world paradigm. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 78(5), 1267-1284. (SSCI-JCR-2021: Q3, 5-Year IF = 2.360)

24. Qu, Q. Q.*, & Damian, M. F. (2015). Cascadedness in Chinese written word production. Frontiers in Psychology, 6:1271. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01271. (SSCI-JCR-2021: Q1, 5-Year IF = 4.426)

25. Qu, Q. Q.*, Damian, M. F., & Kazanina, N. (2013). Reply to O’Seaghdha et al.: Primary phonological planning units in Chinese are phonemically specified. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (PNAS response letter), 110(1), E4. (SCI-JCR-2021: Q1, 5-Year IF = 13.450)

26. Damian, M. F.*, & Qu, Q. Q. (2013). Is handwriting constrained by phonology? Evidence from Stroop tasks with written responses and Chinese characters, Frontiers in Psychology, 4:765. (SSCI-JCR-2021: Q1, 5-Year IF = 4.426)

27. Qu, Q. Q.*, Damian, M. F., & Kazanina, N. (2012). Sound-sizes segments are significant for Mandarin speakers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (PNAS), 109(35), 14265-14270. (SCI-JCR-2020: Q1, 5-Year IF = 13.450)

28. Qu, Q. Q.*, Damian, M. F., Zhang, Q. F., & Zhu, X. B. (2011). Phonology Contributes to Writing: Evidence from Written Word Production in a Nonalphabetic Script. Psychological Science, 22, 1107-1112. (SSCI-JCR-2021: Q1, 5-Year IF = 9.647)

29. 屈青青*, 刘维琳, 李兴珊. (2018). 汉语言语产生的语音加工单元—基于音位的研究. 心理科学进展, 26(9), 1535-1544.

30. 韩海宾, 许萍萍, 屈青青, 程茜,& 李兴珊. (2019). 语言加工过程中的视听跨通道整合.心理科学进展,27(3), 475-489.

31. 顾俊娟, 高志华, & 屈青青. (2020). 汉字位置加工的词边界效应. 心理与行为研究, 18(2), 193-199.

32. 屈青青. (2019). 汉语语音加工单元的特异性. 教育家, 24.

会议报告/展报

1. Neural Representations of semantic and phonological processing in language production, Department of Psychological Sciences, City University of Hong Kong, May 2022.
2.“Temporal dynamics and cognitive mechanisms of language production”, Department of Psychological Sciences, Aberdeen University, March 2022.
3. “Temporal dynamics and cognitive mechanisms of language production”, Virtual Psycholinguistics Forum, May 2021.
4. Cognitive Mechanisms underlying Chinese Language Production, Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Jan. 2021.
5. “The Interface between Spoken and Written Language Processing”, Department of Psychological Sciences, Rice University, February 2020.

更多成果信息请见: http://ir.psych.ac.cn/quqq@psych.ac.cn

中国科学院首批特聘研究岗位（主持，在研）

国家自然科学基金面上项目（主持，在研）

北京市“科技新星”项目 （主持，在研）

国家自然科学基金面上项目（主持，结题）

国家自然科学基金国际(地区)合作与交流项目课题（共同主持，结题）

国家自然科学基金国际(地区)合作与交流项目课题（共同主持，结题）

国家自然科学基金青年项目（主持，结题）

中国科协“青年人才托举”工程项目（主持，结题）

中国科学院青年创新促进会（主持，结题）

中国科学院公派出国访学项目（主持，结题）

中国科学院心理研究所青年人才科研启动项目（主持，结题）